Bhutan OH Evaluation Project

Bhutan OH Evaluation Project

Bhutan OH Evaluation Project

Zoonotic diseases such as rabies and anthrax remain a major concern to both human and animal health in Bhutan, and it is anticipated that many cases go unreported. Contributing factors for the high incidence of zoonotic diseases include: a limited capacity for the control of slaughter processes, a lack of documented information on zoonoses, and a low level of general awareness on occupational health hazards, food safety and disease risks.

Furthermore, the threat the country faces from emerging diseases became clear when Bhutan reported its first highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreak in February 2010.

View preliminary results.

Bhutan’s One Health Initiative

Bhutan has launched a One Health initiative that envisages engagement of stakeholders at national, district and sub-district levels to obtain deeper and more sustainable political support for integrated prevention and management of diseases to mitigate the effect of high impact pathogens of medical and veterinary importance.

This multi-sectoral approach resulted in good collaboration between the major stakeholders who came together to effectively control the HPAI outbreak, with field simulation exercises being conducted jointly between the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Agriculture & Forests. However, there is a need to further build on these initial steps to strengthen collaboration for effective management of rabies and other zoonoses.

Evaluation

This survey is using a questionnaire approach to evaluate the existing coordination and cooperation between the human and animal health sectors in responding to zoonotic disease outbreaks.


Project Objectives

  • To develop a set of criteria for an effective One Health approach to reporting, investigation and management of zoonotic disease outbreaks in Bhutan.
  • To evaluate how effectively the criteria were fulfilled between 2011–2012 during the management of outbreaks of anthrax, rabies, dog bites and HPAI.
  • To compare the effectiveness of collaboration to the procedures currently in place for managing avian influenza.
  • To recommend policy regarding the implementation of a One Health approach for zoonotic disease control in Bhutan.

Intended Outcomes

  • Institutional linkages to respond to emerging or re-emerging zoonoses between the key stakeholders (human health and animal health) will be established and strengthened at all levels (national, district and sub-district).
  • Clearly defined roles and responsibilities of institutions will streamline information exchange, and future responses to any emerging and re-emerging zoonoses will be more coordinated and planned.
  • Early detection and control of any emerging and re-emerging zoonosis at the animal source, which would prevent it from infecting the human population.
  • Deeper and more sustainable political support for the coordinated prevention of high public health and animal impact diseases at the human-animal interface.

Article originally posted on the One Health Network South Asia at: http://www.onehealthnetwork.asia/sites/bhutan-oh-evaluation-project

7

Updates direct to your Email

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts and opportunities by email.

Join 7,243 other subscribers

Post categories

New Tanzania project launched to curb disease transmission from consumption of bushmeat

New Tanzania project launched to curb disease transmission from consumption of bushmeat

New Tanzania project launched to curb disease transmission from consumption of bushmeat

The Arusha-based, Nelson Mandela University and the US Centre[s] for Disease Control have now entered into a project aimed at curbing the transmission of diseases from wild animals to human beings.

The Nelson Mandela University ‘will be granted 5 billion/- to undertake a comprehensive study under which wild animal meat can transmit diseases to human beings.

‘The grant is from the Cooperative Biological Engagement Programme of the US Defence Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) and will define the role of wild animal meat as vehicles from transmitting important zoonotic pathogens to humans.

‘The project will focus on surveillance of especially dangerous pathogens, including anthrax, ‘Brucella’, “Coxiella’ and the Ebola, Marburg and Monkey-pox viruses whose viruses in bush meat in Tanzania, local experts say remain unknown.

‘. . . Local partners in the project include the Tanzania National Parks (TANAPA), Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute (TAWIRI) and the ministries of Livestock Development and Fisheries and Health and Social Servicesthrough their respective departments dealing with veterinary services and public health respectively.

Other partners include the Bill & Melinda Gates [Foundation] which has provided the funds, the Frankfurt Zoological Society, the Penn State University in the US and the Nairobi-based International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), among others.

‘Veterinary investigators in the project from all these institutions will map the distribution of pathogens in bush meat from different geographical and ecological regions of Tanzania using powerful molecular diagnostics assays and genomics-based tools, said the officials at the project launch event. . . .’

Read the whole article in Daily News (Tanzania): Bush meat can be dangerous, 11 Jan 2016.

Article originally appeared on the ILRI website on 11th January, 2016 authored by Susan Macmillan available at:  http://clippings.ilri.org/2016/01/11/new-tanzania-project-launched-to-curb-disease-transmission-from-consumption-of-bushmeat/

7

Updates direct to your Email

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts and opportunities by email.

Join 7,243 other subscribers

Post categories

Second Contagious Cancer Found in Tasmanian Devils

Second Contagious Cancer Found in Tasmanian Devils

Second Contagious Cancer Found in Tasmanian Devils

A second fatal, transmissible cancer has been identified in the already endangered species (Tasmanian devils).

Tasmanian_devilDevil facial tumor disease (DFTD) in Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii) was first found in 1996. Ten years later, it was confirmed as a transmissible cancer. The disease spreads from animal to animal via living cancer cells, causing tumors on the side of the faces or inside the mouths of the carnivorous marsupials. Now, researchers have found a second such tumor, one that is genetically and histologically distinct from DFTD in five animals. The analysis of this new transmissible tumor, called DFT2, appeared this week (December 28) in PNAS.

DFTD, which researchers are now calling DFT1, was first noticed by a wildlife photographer and traced by researchers to a female animal. Biting spreads the tumors, which arose from mutated neural support cells called Schwann cells. The tumors metastasize readily to the lymph nodes, lungs, and kidneys in the animals. Transmissible cancers are very rare, although not all are fatal. So far, such tumors have been found in only three species—dogs, Tasmanian devils, and soft-shell clams.

“The devils and their tumors have been closely monitored since discovery of DFT1 and DFT2 was detected as a result of this close monitoring,” study coauthor Ruth Pye of the University of Tasmania’s Menzies Institute for Medical Research wrote in an email to The Scientist.

“One transmissible cancer is rare,” wrote study coauthor Greg Woods of Tasmania in an email. “Two is astonishing.”

“This is an amazing and fascinating story,” Beata Ujvari, an ecologist and evolutionary biologist at Deakin University in Geelong, Australia, told The Scientist in an email. “Yet, it is less surprising to find a new structural tumor variant has emerged in this same species, knowing that the animals are inbred, how prone the animals are to neoplasia, how quickly DTFD has evolved, and that anthropogenic selection enhances the cancer evolution of these tumors.”

DFT2 tumors look anatomically similar to DFT1 malignancies, but the two have distinct histologies and are genetically different. DFT1 cells are arranged in bundles, while DFT2 cells congregate in sheet-like structures. Analyzing microsatellites throughout the tumor genomes, the researchers concluded that DFT2 tumors were as different from DFT1 tumors as they were from healthy devil cells. DFT2 tumors, Pye, Woods, and their colleagues found, showed rearrangements on three chromosomes and, unlike DFT1, had both the X and Y chromosomes present.

“These are mutations are like that of any cancer but with the twist in that these tumors have acquired this new trait, which is this funny ability to spread between individuals,” said Stephen Goff of Columbia University in New York City. Goff studies a contagious cancer that affects soft-shell clamsand was not involved in the present study.

“For me, the most interesting question is: What are the genetic changes that allow for this extreme version of metastasis that allows tumor cells to colonize a new host animal and evade the immune system?” Goff added.

DFT1 cells are thought to be able to evade the host immune system because, although they have a different major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genotype from the devils, they do not express these MHC molecules on their surfaces. In mammals, MHC molecules function to identify foreign or diseased cells, including cancer. The DFT2 tumors analyzed had a different MHC genotype both from DFT1 tumors and from the animals in which the DFT2 tumors were identified.

“I’ve often wondered why the MHC genes evolved their enormous variability,” said Jennifer Marshall Graves, a geneticist at La Trobe University in Melbourne, Australia. “Maybe it helps stop cancer from spreading between animals,” Graves continued. “If you lose too much variation, as has happened for animals such as the devils, what is to stop cancers from spreading? For me, the discovery of a new DFTD suggests that the low MHC variability of these animals makes them particularly prone to rare, transmissible cancers.”

The researchers are now focusing on fine-tuned genetic and transcriptomic analyses of DFT2 and working on a vaccine against DFT1, which has wiped out nearly 90 percent of the species. “DFT2 is similar to DFT1 and immune responses against DFT1 should also react against DFT2,” wrote Woods.

For Ujvari, whether one vaccine could be effective against both tumor types is an open question. And it remains to be seen whether the emergence of DFT2 was facilitated by the evolution of resistance to DFT1 in animals living in areas where both tumor types were found, as the researchers have proposed.

R.J. Pye et al., “A second transmissible cancer in Tasmanian devils,” PNAS, doi:10.1073/pnas.1519691113, 2015.

Article originally appeared on The Scientist website on December 29, 2015 authored by Anna Azvolinsky: http://mobile.the-scientist.com/article/44920/second-contagious-cancer-found-in-tasmanian-devils

7

Updates direct to your Email

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts and opportunities by email.

Join 7,243 other subscribers

Post categories

One Health: An opportunity for an interprofessional approach to healthcare

One Health: An opportunity for an interprofessional approach to healthcare

One Health: An opportunity for an interprofessional approach to healthcare

ReportReport:

Courtenaya M., Sweeneyb, J., Zielinskab, P., Blakec, S.B. and  La Ragioned, R. (2015):One Health: An opportunity for an interprofessional approach to healthcare. Journal of Interprofessional Care. Volume 29, Issue 6, 2015. doi: htp://10.3109/13561820.2015.1041584

Summary

One Health has been viewed as the collaborative effort between professions and disciplines working locally, nationally, and globally to attain optimal health for people, animals, and the environment.

For One Health principles to be operationalised, interprofessional education and interprofessional collaborative practice are essential. However, interprofessional initiatives between the human health professions and veterinary medicine focus primarily on patient care in the human health setting. The purpose of this report was to describe two models of collaboration between human and veterinary medicine that have been designed to address human and animal health challenges in practice. Initiatives that involve this cooperation are providing access to affordable and clean drinking water. Implications linked to these initiatives are explored in relation to the need for an interprofessional approach to attain optimal health for people, animals, and the environment.

Article appeared on the Taylor & Francis online platform at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/13561820.2015.1041584?journalCode=ijic20

7

Updates direct to your Email

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts and opportunities by email.

Join 7,243 other subscribers

Post categories

‘One Health, One Medicine’ Using research to assist both man and beast

‘One Health, One Medicine’ Using research to assist both man and beast

‘One Health, One Medicine’ Using research to assist both man and beast

“Research funded by the Wellcome Trust and implemented jointly by UK and Kenyan-based institutions investigates epidemiology of zoonotic diseases-these are diseases transmitted between animals and people”

PAZ ProjectDrive into a shamba, a Kenyan small-holding, and you can observe first hand the close relationship rural Kenyans hold with their animals: Men ploughing the fields with teams of cattle; women milking cows and goats or using fresh dung to floor their houses; poultry, cats, dogs and children playing together. Pigs, goats and sheep wander in and out of houses, latrines and kitchens, picking at anything remotely edible, all categories of household wastes included.

All the while you are also made aware of the trappings of poverty: pot-holed tracks, no running water or electricity and children bearing the tell-tale pot bellies of parasitic worm infection. Livestock often show overt signs of disease, ill thrift and anaemia being particularly common.

A stereotypical view of Africa, maybe, but a view that is none-the-less a reality and that, when you stop to look, can give an insight into the diseases encountered by those living in such communities. In these marginalised communities, zoonotic diseases – pathogens transmitted between animals and people – exert a heavy burden.

The PAZ (People, Animals & their Zoonoses) project, funded by the Wellcome Trust, brings together a multidisciplinary team of scientists from the School of Biological Sciences at the University of Edinburgh, the International Livestock Research Institute in Kenya and the Kenya Medical Research Institute. Under the project human and animal health teams will visit more than 450 homesteads in Western Kenya over 3 years, collecting data and samples from people, cattle and pigs, while offering health checks and advice or referral to those who require it.

Bringing basic health care facilities directly to the people and livestock of Western Kenya is one of the outcomes of the project, although it is the future outcomes of this research on which the greatest value is placed. Following a ‘One Health’ paradigm, the project will address both human and animal health, and its research agenda includes an effort to assess the true burden of zoonotic diseases in both humans and livestock. The project is the first to focus on quantifying the importance of zoonotic diseases in the context of other infectious diseases, understanding in detail the factors that put livestock and people at risk. It will trial new field-appropriate diagnostic tests and work on designing livestock-targeted interventions that are reasonably cheap and easy to implement and that may have an impact on human public health.

The PAZ project brings together epidemiologists, veterinarians, medical health professionals and laboratory technologists working as a single team in a study area covering a large proportion of the Western Province of Kenya, stretching from Lake Victoria in the south along the Ugandan Border towards Mount Elgon in the North.

The important zoonotic diseases which will be studied by the project include Brucellosis, Bovine TB, Q-fever, endemic Rift Valley Fever, Cysticercosis and zoonotic Trypanosomiasis. The possibility of acquiring these diseases within most shambas is high, due to the abundance of risk factors, both observable to the naked eye and those of a more hidden nature. A natural environment conducive to transmission, regular close contact between people and their animals, access of those animals to human waste, little preventative health provision for domestic stock, inconsistent meat inspection, and poor quality food and forage for both humans and animals all contribute to a high risk of acquiring infections. In addition, the presence in these same populations of humans and livestock of other, non-zoonotic diseases, such as HIV/AIDS may increase the chance of individuals acquiring a zoonotic disease in the first place.

For many people in rural Kenya today, zoonotic disease will remain undiagnosed or misdiagnosed. The same is true for their livestock. A multitude of factors are involved in this under-diagnosis: a lack of health seeking behaviour, the prohibitive cost of medical services, lack of veterinary service delivery, poor diagnostic test availability and lack of awareness amongst the population, or even the local medical and veterinary services. This is well demonstrated by the ubiquitous diagnosis of malaria for anyone suffering a fever – while malaria is undoubtedly a very serious health issue, its over-diagnosis hides many other problems.

To compound this, people living in Kenya and similar countries may easily fall under the health policy radar – many are born, live and die without official record being made of them, they have a weak, or non-existent, political voice and the causes of their deaths are never recorded. Thus, while these zoonotic diseases are grouped as ‘neglected zoonotic diseases,’ it would be equally correct to identify them as ‘diseases of neglected populations’. Two tenants at the core of the PAZ project’s ‘One Health’ paradigm are the belief that human and animal health are irrevocably entwined and that the improvement of both requires close collaboration between the medical and veterinary professions with support from allied disciplines. The greater understanding of the link between human and animal health which the project aims to develop will mark the first step in addressing the problem of neglected zoonotic diseases internationally. (Eric M. Fevre – Lian F. Doble, University of Edinburgh,  www.atomiumculture.eu) – derstandard.at/1308680366514/One-Health-one-Medicine-Using-research-to-assist-both-man-and-beast

Article originally appeared at: http://derstandard.at/1308680366514/One-Health-one-Medicine-Using-research-to-assist-both-man-and-beast

7

Updates direct to your Email

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts and opportunities by email.

Join 7,243 other subscribers

Post categories

Deforestation linked to rise in cases of emerging zoonotic malaria

Deforestation linked to rise in cases of emerging zoonotic malaria

Deforestation linked to rise in cases of emerging zoonotic malaria

Research suggests environmental changes are driving increase in Plasmodium knowlesi malaria – an infection usually found only in monkeys – among people in Malaysia.

MacaqueA steep rise in human cases of P. knowlesi malaria in Malaysia is likely to be linked to deforestation and associated environmental changes, according to new research published in Emerging Infectious Diseases. The study, led by the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, is the first to explore how changes in land use are impacting the emergence of the disease.

Plasmodium knowlesi is a zoonotic malaria parasite, transmitted between hosts by mosquitoes, which is common in forest-dwelling macaque monkeys. Although only recently reported in humans, it is now the most common form of human malaria in many areas of Malaysia, and has been reported across southeast Asia. In recent years, Malaysia has seen widespread deforestation alongside rapid oil palm and other agricultural expansion. It is thought changes in the way land is used could be a key driver in the emergence of P. knowlesi, but until now this has not been investigated in detail.

The study focused on the Kudat and Kota Marudu districts in Sabah, Malaysia, covering an area of more than 3,000km² with a population of approximately 120,000 people. Researchers used hospital records for 2008-2012 to collect data on the number of P. knowlesi malaria cases from villages in the districts. Information collected from satellite data helped the team to map the local forest, land use, and environmental changes around 450 villages, in order to correlate how these changes might affect human infection.

They found that the number of P. knowlesi cases was strongly linked to deforestation in areas surrounding the villages.  This could be explained by a number of factors, including humans coming into closer contact with the forest inhabited by the macaques and the mosquito vectors, due to employment in tree clearance and expanding agriculture. Another factor could be that as land use changes in this way, macaque populations are becoming more densely concentrated in areas of forest where humans are present.

Lead author Kimberly Fornace, Research Fellow at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, said: “The dramatic rise in the number of P. knowlesi malaria cases in humans in Malaysia in the past ten years has been most common in areas with deforestation, as well as areas that are close to patches of forest where humans, macaques and mosquitoes are coming into closer and more frequent contact. This suggests that there is a higher risk of P. knowlesi transmission in areas where land use is changing, and this knowledge will help focus efforts on these areas and also predict and respond to future outbreaks. Given our findings, we view deforestation as having distinct public health consequences which need to be urgently addressed.”

The findings show the study region had undergone significant environmental changes, with many villages substantially affected by deforestation. During the five-year study alone, 39% of the region’s villages lost more than 10% of the forest cover in their surrounding 1km radius, and half of villages lost more than 10% within a 5km radius. Overall, forest cover in Kudat and Kota Marudu declined by 4.8% during the study period.

The findings also confirmed that P. knowlesi is the most common cause of human malaria cases in the region.

The authors note that some cases of malaria may have been unreported as they were asymptomatic or resolved without treatment. P. knowlesi can be mistaken for other forms of human malaria in microscope diagnosis, however the authors adjusted for this uncertainty in the study. They also highlight that the environmental data were limited as they could not discriminate between types of forest or crops, meaning further work is needed to investigate whether vegetation type is a risk factor for P. knowlesi.

This study was funded by the Biotechnology and Biosciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, and Natural Environment Research Council, through the Environmental and Social Ecology of Human Infectious Diseases Initiative (ESEI).

The research was carried out in collaboration with the Infectious Disease Society Kota Kinabalu Sabah, Malaysia; Hospital Queen Elizabeth Clinical Research Centre, Malaysia; Menzies School of Health Research, Australia; Sabah Department of Health, Malaysia; and the University of Glasgow, UK.

Publication:

Article originally appeared on the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine website on 18th December, 2015 at: http://www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/news/2015/deforestation_malaria_link.html

7

Updates direct to your Email

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts and opportunities by email.

Join 7,243 other subscribers

Post categories