AMR-MPTF Biosecurity Guidelines Review and Stakeholders Validation Workshop Nakuru, Kenya held between 12-16th July 2021

AMR-MPTF Biosecurity Guidelines Review and Stakeholders Validation Workshop Nakuru, Kenya held between 12-16th July 2021

AMR-MPTF Biosecurity Guidelines Review and Stakeholders Validation Workshop Nakuru, Kenya held between 12-16th July 2021

The World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) funded through the AMR-Multi Partner Trust Fund (MPTF) held a write shop on March 2021 in Nakuru, Kenya to develop national farm biosecurity guidelines and interventions for high-risk food chains (poultry, pigs and dairy cattle) where high AMR has been reported in Kenya. Reference to existing regulations, international standards and best practice were made to identify potential pathways for the introduction and spread of animal disease in a farm or areas where poultry, pigs and dairy cattle are reared; and described mitigation measures packaged as guidelines for these production systems.

A second validation workshop was held between 12-16 July 2021 to review and finalize the guidelines and validate farm biosecurity guidelines for Dairy, Poultry, and Pig value chains to enhance preventive approaches to containing AMR. During the 3-day workshop stakeholders completed drafting the biosecurity guidelines and validated the developed guidance documents for use in training, extension and national dissemination to relevant stakeholders including professionals and farmers.

Participants for the validation workshop were drawn from the Directorate of Veterinary Services (DVS), Directorate of livestock production (DLP), veterinarians working in the counties, Kenya Dairy Board (KDB), as well as veterinary paraprofessionals and other animal health field experts working in the identified poultry, pig, and dairy cattle value chains and as well as representatives from FAO.

The adoption of biosecurity measures is expected to sustainably contribute to improved animal husbandry as well as minimize AMR risks attributed to foods of animal origin that could be contaminated by resistant pathogens. Moreover, subsequent use of the validated biosecurity guidelines for training and during extension services by animal health service providers is expected to provide tools to support farmers in improving their production practices. This in turn is anticipated to improve the livelihoods and increase resilience of the livestock farmers.

Updates direct to your Email

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts and opportunities by email.

Join 7,243 other subscribers

Post categories

Report says major supermarkets in Kenya selling superbug laden meat

Report says major supermarkets in Kenya selling superbug laden meat

Report says major supermarkets in Kenya selling superbug laden meat

Kenyan consumers could be eating contaminated meat from the country’s major supermarkets. This is according to a study by World Animal Protection which is challenging stakeholders to improve animal welfare and ensure responsible use of antibiotics to reverse the trend.

The study by the animal welfare organisation, collected samples between April and May 2020 from the top six supermarkets in Nairobi, Nakuru, Uasin Gishu, Kisumu, Laikipia and Nyeri to determine presence of bacteria and their spectrum of antibiotic-resistant.

The laboratory analysis was done at the Centre for Microbiology Research at the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI).

Out of the 187 pork samples, 98.4 percent had bacterial growth. In 206 chicken samples, 96.6 percent exhibited bacterial growth.

Key highlights from the report:

    • The most common contaminant was E. coli bacteria however known enteric pathogens such as Salmonella and Shigella were also isolated. While majority of the contaminants were not necessarily harmful, the presence of Salmonella and Shigella was concerning as there is likelihood of an animal origin from the farm level.
    • In the study, 38.5% of the 525 bacterial isolates examined recorded resistance to more than three antibiotics (Multi-drug resistant organisms or Superbugs). This resistance was also noted for high priority antibiotics on the WHO list such as Ciprofloxacin, Erythromycin, Vancomycin, Cefoxatime and Cefepime.
    • Interesting to note, the highest contamination was found in own brands managed by the supermarkets. It is against this backdrop that the World Animal Protection (Africa office) is urging industry players to improve animal welfare practices and ensure antibiotics are not abused. Supermarkets should start looking at policies around how they buy food supplies. They need to audit and ensure the producer is doing the right thing at the production level,
    • The report also noted that other studies have shown that poor animal welfare and stress factors have the potential of increasing the susceptibility of farm animals to diseases hence increasing the use of antimicrobials to control these infections while reducing the microbiological safety of animal products and threatening public health. for example, a study done in Kenya by the Global Antibiotic Resistance Partnership (GARP) reported that up to 70% of the imported antibiotics are given to chickens, pigs and cows.
    • The report showed there is a direct correlation between how animals are treated and the quality of the end product.  Morever, misuse of antibiotics in the food chain is impacts public health.

    Proposed solutions by World Animal Protection

    • The report noted that there is need to embrace and actively implement the One Health concept to understand the interconnectivity of animal health, human health and environmental health. For example, when people learn there is a problem with meat, they will tend to shift to eating mboga (vegetables), yet it is this mboga could also be contaminated from the environment and  used as food for humans and feed for some animals. It is therefore important to have a holistic and multisectoral approach in addressing antimicrobial resistance.
    • World Animal Protection believes that responsible use of antibiotics in farm animals is essential in tackling the growing Antimicrobial Resistance. This should be done by putting proper policies and measures aimed at reducing the use of antibiotics on animals by promoting higher welfare production systems in the livestock industry. Such systems should include good housing conditions, health care and the promotion of natural animal behaviour. They should also provide for improved management, biosecurity, hygiene, sanitation, optimal animal husbandry, nutrition, genetics and use of preventive methods such as vaccination, leading to improved animal health and welfare.
    • By eliminating the worst methods and practices of animal production such as the use of cages, crowded or barren conditions, poorly ventilated production units with wet beddings and inadequate feeding systems, animals shall be less stressed hence less likely to suffer illness, leading to less dependency on antibiotics. High welfare production standards are not only good for animals but also for people – their health, livelihoods and businesses.

    The call to action by World Animal Protection 

    World Animal Protection is calling on the following key stakeholders to take urgent action in addressing the superbug crisis:

    • Retailers / Supermarkets: There is a need to strengthen their food procurement policies in order to discourage animals raised in inhumane production systems from accessing their outlets. There is also need to ensure that their suppliers of livestock products commit to using antibiotics responsibly on their farms.
    • Livestock producers/farmers: To move to higher welfare production systems that caters for the fundamental freedoms of the animals and commit to responsible and prudent use of antibiotics in the production system.
    • Government: To strengthen policies and regulatory framework in livestock farming to allow for improved animal welfare and responsible antibiotic use of antibiotics. They should also enforce the available laws especially those that control the access and availability of antibiotics.
    • Consumers: To use their purchasing power to pressure retailers and supermarkets to source and retail products from high welfare production systems. They should also commit to better animal welfare by joining our campaigns to transform global food systems

    References / coverage of the report on mainstream media

    Updates direct to your Email

    Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts and opportunities by email.

    Join 7,243 other subscribers

    Post categories

    Status of battery cage farming in Kenya

    Status of battery cage farming in Kenya

    Status of battery cage farming in Kenya

    An assessment by the Africa Network for Animal Welfare (ANAW) on the adoption of battery cages as a means of poultry production in Kenya revealed that their use is increasingly gaining popularity among small-scale peri-urban and urban farmers. The system was shown to have been adopted within close to half of the counties within Kenya with the target market being the urban populace. Despite the low adoption of the cage system with a majority of the poultry being raised under free-range, 41.26% of respondents indicated that a few elite farmers had already incorporated the use of battery cages further suggesting that the system is rapidly gaining popularity among other farmers. Key counties identified to have adopted the use of battery cages include Migori, Bungoma, Nyeri, Uasin Gishu, Isiolo, Busia, Kericho, TransNzoia, Kirinyaga, Embu, Bomet, Kiambu, Nyamira, Laikipia, Tana River, Kisii, Nakuru, Taita-Taveta, Meru, Homa Bay, Muranga, Machakos, Narok, Lamu, Kisumu, Elgeyo-Marakwet and Marsabit. It was identified that cognizance on poultry welfare issues associated with use of battery cages was low among farmers as well as businesspeople involved in the importation, sale, and supply of the cages.
    70.49% of county officials indicated that most battery cage suppliers and farmers are keen on profits and view animal welfare as a foreign concept.
    Consumer behavior especially their attitudes and preferences that affect buying behavior of products derived from poultry raised in battery cages was noted to be a less contributing factor as a criterion for purchase. 84.12% of county officials believe that consumers of poultry products raised under battery cage systems are not interested in the means of production nor the compromised welfare state of the birds. Consumers consider factors that include size, fat content, presentation of chicken, meat, and color of eggs. Consumers were mentioned to be ignorant of the origin of the products, the type of management system used to rear the birds, irresponsible use of antibiotics and growth promoters, the means of transportation used to deliver them to the market and general food safety.
    Finally, poultry welfare is not well articulated nor appreciated among consumers who are more fascinated by the end product rather than the means of production utilized.
    ?

    Full reports (click images to download)

    Farm animal welfare concerns during Covid-19 pandemic

    Farm animal welfare concerns during Covid-19 pandemic

    Farm animal welfare concerns during Covid-19 pandemic

    At present, there is no known risk of transmission of COVID-19 (ie. SARS-COV2 virus) from livestock to humans and no direct COVID-19 infection risk with consumption of animal products, noting general food hygiene should prevail.

    The World organisation for Animal (OIErecommends that production and consumption of animal products can continue as usual, following routine sanitary precautions.

    There is no current evidence that livestock can be infected or carry COVID-19, though scientific research is being conducted to confirm. Livestock feed is also not directly a risk, though delays in feeding, feed transport and animal care must be mitigated.

    Animal welfare organisations like World Animal Protection have also emphasized that neglect, abandonment, inhumane culling or cruelty to animals is never acceptable.

    To date, we are aware or anticipate the following, but please do alert us (email or in the comment section below) if you come across these concerns or other concerns for farm animals in your area (remember the below are never acceptible when it comes to animal welfare):

    • delays in feed to animals resulting in hunger and starvation – due to lack of contingencies with border delays, trade delays, movement delays generally
    • possible delays in care – veterinary services are considered essential services in some countries, but may be not all
    • lack of feed, care, veterinary services – due to remoteness, inability to afford or access such (eg. smallholders, price fluctuations etc)
    • lack of staff – due to economics, sickness with COVID-19 infection, social distancing needs or inability to access, travel to farms / work
    • neglect, disease, death or dumping of animals – due to any of the above plus some misinformation occurring

    Important resource

    The OIE has posted the following technical Covid-19 Q and A 1/4/20: https://www.oie.int/en/scientific-expertise/specific-information-and-recommendations/questions-and-answers-on-2019novel-coronavirus/

    Updates direct to your Email

    Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts and opportunities by email.

    Join 7,243 other subscribers

    Post categories

    Covid-19 and Veterinary Services in Kenya

    Covid-19 and Veterinary Services in Kenya

    Covid-19 and Veterinary Services in Kenya

    The first case of Coronavirus disease, COVID-19, was confirmed in Kenya on 12th March 2020. Since then, the COVID-19 National Emergency Response Committee, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Cooperatives and various county governments have issued guidelines on public and individual behavior to manage the disease.

    We all recognize that veterinary services are essential to ensure a continuum in food safety, disease prevention and animal emergency management. Consequently, the following measures which are in line with the communique of the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) and the World Veterinary Association (WVA) on “COVID-19 and veterinary activities designated as essential” are issued.

    Disease surveillance: it is of paramount importance to carry out active and passive animal disease surveillance within your respective county so as to quickly detect any notifiable diseases which may arise. This is because, such diseases often engender huge losses which can only worsen the economic situation in livestock value chains. Moreover, some of these diseases are zoonotic and can further complicate the prevailing delicate public health status in the country.

    It is therefore advised that whenever a notifiable disease is suspected, immediately impose a
    provisional quarantine as you take samples for diagnosis. If an outbreak is confirmed, maintain the quarantine and carry out a ring vaccination in the affected areas. It is therefore necessary that you procure and keep stocks of vaccines against diseases that commonly occur in your locality. For various counties, these include Foot and Mouth Disease; Anthrax; Rift Valley Fever (rains are expected); Lumpy Skin Disease; Sheep and Goat Pox; Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia; Camel Pox; Blue Tongue; Peste des Petit Ruminants and New Castle Disease. Counties in the North-Eastern Region should be on the lookout for the camel associated Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-COV).

    When vaccinating animals in large groups, it is advised that you wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) including a face mask and gloves since you will be meeting many livestock producers from diverse locations. Where possible, inform livestock producers to present animals individually at vaccination sites.

    Prioritize animal movement control as a key intervention in animal disease control. It is cheaper and often very effective. As much as possible, examine animals before issuing movement permits. Remember to issue permits for animals migrating in search of pasture and water.

    Animal markets and other gatherings: it is notable that some counties have closed all markets including animal markets. This is commendable as such markets act as foci of disease exchange among animals. Where markets are still operating, conduct disease surveillance on various animal species presented for sale.

    Other gatherings of animals include agricultural shows, trade fairs and dips. Whereas shows and trade fairs are now banned, dipping of animals has to continue as a key disease control measure. Carry out disease surveillance at dip sites and advise animal owners as appropriate. If possible, consider offering preventive vaccination at the dips.

    Slaughterhouses: these facilities will continue to operate as scheduled but be sure to reduce unnecessary crowding around and within the slaughterhouses. Only meat inspectors, flayers and a few people to clean green offal should be in the slaughterhouse. Outside the slaughterhouse, have the meat transporters only. They should however stay in their vehicles and wait to be summoned to load meat and quickly vacate the slaughterhouse premises. All hangers-on including people selling tea, ropes and paper bags that usually throng slaughterhouses must be kept away. Request for police assistance where necessary.

    Meat markets include Burma in Nairobi, butcheries and open food markets such as Wakulima in Nairobi and similar markets across the country. The open food markets are also referred to as “wet markets”. All these forms of markets shall under no circumstances harbor any live animals like chickens, ducks, rabbits, cats and dogs. It is worth noting that the COVID-19 Pandemic arose at a wet market where meat was displayed for sale in close proximity to live animals. It is suspected that the virus made “a species jump” from the live animals at the market to humans through meat which was handled by people who touched their faces and transferred the virus to their respiratory systems through their nostrils or mouths and contracted the disease. The virus then quickly mutated in humans and has been able to move from person to person through air-borne droplets or coming into contact with virus-contaminated surfaces.
    It is necessary to observe that meat inspection takes place in markets like Burma and many open food markets where poultry and rabbits are slaughtered. Responsible meat inspectors should be instructed to observe the contents of this Circular. In all other meat markets where veterinary personnel are not directly involved in sanitary matters, please liaise with your colleagues in the Department of Public Health to implement these measures.

    Audit of farms: try and visit most animal farms in your county and stress to the owners the need to maintain separate sleeping quarters from places where animals are kept at night. It has been observed that in some counties, people sleep in the same rooms with animals like sheep, goats, calves, chickens, piglets and even adult cows. Animals are known sources of coronavirus that they can secrete from their nostrils or in their faeces. The latter can contaminate human food of any kind and even water and precipitate human infections. Coronaviruses are first evolving. Mutations of animal variants which can potentially infect humans are on-going so keeping a reasonable distance from animals is necessary at all times.

    Finally, whenever in doubt as to how to proceed in managing an animal disease situation or a food safety measure during this time of partial lockdown to contain COVID-19, call the Director of Veterinary Services immediately.

    Observe these guidelines alongside those issued by the COVID-19 National Emergency Response Committee, Ministry of Health and your county leadership consistently. Further guidelines on veterinary services may be issued by my office in future depending on the progression of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    Author 

    Dr. Obadiah N. Njagi, PhD, OGW
    Director of Veterinary Services

    7

    Updates direct to your Email

    Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts and opportunities by email.

    Join 7,243 other subscribers

    Post categories

    Fast-food Chicken restaurants in Kenya serving up shockingly low welfare standards

    Fast-food Chicken restaurants in Kenya serving up shockingly low welfare standards

    Fast-food Chicken restaurants in Kenya serving up shockingly low welfare standards

    Some of the largest global fast-food chains operating in Africa – including KFC, Burger King, Dominos Pizza and Subway – are under the spotlight as global charity, World Animal Protection, exposes these companies’ welfare standards for chickens raised for their meat.

    ‘The Pecking Order (TPO) 2020’ report which ranks how fast food restaurants are performing on their commitment, ambition and transparency on chicken welfare globally, revealing some alarming findings. All businesses operating in Africa are performing worryingly low; no companies have received points for their operations here. This means that consumers are unwittingly buying meat from chickens who are subject to unnecessary suffering and cruelty.

    Many of the birds being served at these restaurants live in cramped, poorly ventilated, barren environments with wet and caked litter leading to many of the chickens suffering from lameness and skin lesions. Moreover, most companies are not showing any ambition to improve their standards. In the TPO, companies are assessed via publicly available information on three areas:

    • Commitment, their policies clearly state how important the welfare of chickens is to the company;
    • Ambition, a defined timeline that demonstrates the objectives, targets and promises a company has made to improve chicken welfare and when they will meet them; and
    • Transparency, through their performance reporting, and how clear the company is about living up to its promises on chicken welfare.

    The companies assessed are KFC, Burger King, Subway, Domino’s Pizza Group, Domino’s Inc, McDonald’s, Nando’s, Pizza Hut and Starbucks. Also included in the rankings was Java House, Kenya’s largest fast-food chain. The key findings from ‘The pecking order 2020’ are:

    • Broiler chicken welfare in Kenya is very poor as all companies have received no points for their operations here.
    • Four companies – Burger King, Pizza Hut, Domino’s and Java House were classed as having ‘very poor’ chicken welfare globally.
    • Commitments are not coming fast enough – over 160 companies globally have signed up to the Better Chicken Commitment but two thirds of the companies assessed have not done so.
    • Commitments are limited to just the USA, Canada and a small number of European countries, so more take up in Africa and globally is crucial and required.
    • No company is reporting on performance on all welfare aspects globally. This makes it difficult to hold them accountable for the commitments they’ve made
    • Only a third (three of the nine) of companies assessed scored globally above a score of ‘poor’, so most companies are still failing.
    • Only one company, KFC, has been ranked as ‘making progress’, based on them signing the Better Chicken Commitment in six European countries– which includes using slower growing chicken breeds and giving chicken more light and space to behave more naturally – and some examples of performance reporting.

    While it’s encouraging to see companies like KFC starting to take chicken welfare seriously in parts of Europe, the results remain extremely concerning, demonstrating that most companies have a long way to go to give chickens better lives in Africa. World Animal Protection is challenging these global brands to extend their commitments into their African businesses.

    Dr. Victor Yamo, Campaigns Manager at World Animal Protection says: “Millions of African birds live in cramped, poorly ventilated, barren environments with wet and caked litter leading to many of the chickens suffering from lameness and skin lesions. These birds never get the chance to grow at a healthy rate or behave naturally. Instead, their lives are all too often full of pain, fear and stress. There is no excuse why these iconic companies with the power to put an end to this suffering continue causing such suffering for the sake of their own profits.

    Dr. Yamo further observes that KFC has taken the right step in committing to the Better Chicken Commitment in 6 European countries – but this now needs to be replicated in Africa since Consumers globally are becoming increasingly concerned about animal welfare, and we will continue to speak up for them and for chickens to put pressure on companies to make real change.“

    World Animal Protection is calling on these global companies to lead and ensure that any chickens that are being served at their restaurants are guaranteed a life worth living. The companies assessed in ‘The pecking order’ have a seismic opportunity at their hands and could use their power to improve the lives of hundreds of millions of animals.

    To find out more visit: https://www.worldanimalprotection.or.ke/PeckingOrder2020

    7

    Read the full report

    Updates direct to your Email

    Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts and opportunities by email.

    Join 7,243 other subscribers

    Post categories